New Mexico
Men -
Women
2016
-
2017 -
2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
81 |
Josh Kerr |
SO |
31:40 |
113 |
Alexander Palm |
SO |
31:50 |
366 |
Jonny Glen |
SO |
32:35 |
519 |
Jacob Simonsen |
SO |
32:52 |
537 |
Linton Taylor |
SR |
32:54 |
605 |
Jared Garcia |
SO |
33:02 |
1,579 |
Tyler Valdez |
SR |
34:25 |
1,972 |
Taylor Potter |
JR |
35:03 |
2,122 |
Michael Wilson |
JR |
35:22 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.9% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.3% |
Top 10 in Regional |
100.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Josh Kerr |
Alexander Palm |
Jonny Glen |
Jacob Simonsen |
Linton Taylor |
Jared Garcia |
Tyler Valdez |
Taylor Potter |
Michael Wilson |
Joe Piane Invitational (Blue) |
09/29 |
670 |
31:34 |
31:21 |
32:22 |
32:49 |
33:06 |
|
|
34:17 |
34:34 |
Nuttycombe Invitational |
10/13 |
783 |
32:27 |
31:16 |
32:27 |
33:14 |
32:49 |
|
34:00 |
35:53 |
|
Mountain West Championship |
10/27 |
648 |
31:26 |
31:59 |
32:41 |
32:56 |
32:18 |
32:23 |
34:34 |
35:07 |
36:16 |
Mountain Region Championships |
11/10 |
837 |
31:32 |
32:16 |
32:58 |
32:58 |
33:26 |
33:36 |
34:42 |
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
9.1% |
25.1 |
628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
Region Championship |
100% |
8.0 |
227 |
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
2.2 |
18.4 |
55.6 |
22.5 |
1.0 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Josh Kerr |
59.3% |
68.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
|
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.3 |
Alexander Palm |
39.1% |
86.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Jonny Glen |
9.1% |
176.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jacob Simonsen |
9.1% |
215.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linton Taylor |
9.1% |
219.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jared Garcia |
9.1% |
224.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tyler Valdez |
9.4% |
247.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Josh Kerr |
23.0 |
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.9 |
2.4 |
2.1 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.9 |
3.2 |
3.7 |
4.1 |
5.1 |
4.5 |
4.8 |
3.8 |
3.0 |
4.4 |
Alexander Palm |
28.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
2.5 |
2.6 |
2.8 |
3.2 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
4.2 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
Jonny Glen |
51.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jacob Simonsen |
60.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linton Taylor |
62.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jared Garcia |
66.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tyler Valdez |
105.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
0.3% |
100.0% |
| |
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.2 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
5 |
6 |
2.2% |
81.8% |
| |
|
|
|
1.0 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
1.8 |
6 |
7 |
18.4% |
37.0% |
| |
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.9 |
1.2 |
0.7 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
|
11.6 |
|
6.8 |
7 |
8 |
55.6% |
0.3% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
55.5 |
|
0.2 |
8 |
9 |
22.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
1.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
13 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
Total |
100% |
9.1% |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
1.0 |
1.7 |
1.3 |
1.9 |
1.2 |
0.7 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
91.0 |
0.0 |
9.1 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.